RESEARCH LUXURY SMARTWATCHES VERSUS TRADITIONAL WATCHES
The research was conducted by our Head of Search, Benedicte Soteras, who measured global demand in English through Google searches on luxury smartwatches, and whose research was published in The New York Times for an article looking at whether the introduction of smartwatches had affected the sales of traditional watches.
It found that overall interest in smartwatches grew from 2015 to the end of 2018, representing a 222 percent increase over three years. Though for brands like Sony and Apple, consumers who searched for more generic terms like “Sony smartwatch” and “Apple smartwatch” in Google, interest “had plateaued and in some cases, declined.”
On average, there were more than 2.7 million searches a month for the term “smartwatch” on Google during January 2018 to March 2019, with interest steadily growing over the past five years. In 2017, the average monthly search demand for “smartwatch” was 2.2 million. And in 2018, that number rose to 2.7 million searches a month.
Demand for smartwatches is not expected to slow, according to Soteras. “With only (the first) three months of data for 2019 and the Christmas spike still to come, we’re only 13,000 (average monthly searches) short of the 2018 average.”
In comparison, overall interest in luxury smartwatches from 2015 to the end of 2018 grew by 187 percent. Though it is important to note that the volumes of search are significantly lower than those of smartwatches. In 2017, the average monthly search demand for “luxury smartwatch” was 4,000 and in 2018, that number rose to 4,300.
Looking specifically at some selected brands, Google searches for the Tag Heuer smartwatch reached a peak of 350,000 in December 2015, but has plateaued since the launch. Meanwhile search interest for similar models by other luxury watch brands like Montblanc, Hublot and Louis Vuitton have yet to reach more than 50,000 Google searches a month.
“Another point found was that demand for smartwatches of specific high-end brands now equals demand for some more “traditional” product categories,” said Soteras.
Global search demand for “Hublot smartwatch” and “self-winding watch” during April 2018 to March 2019 stood at 8,100, and similarly global search demand for “Louis Vuitton smartwatch” was 6,600 compared to “dual time watch” at 5,400.
“Also users seem more inclined to buy (smartwatches) online than traditional watches, based on the numerous searches including specific online retailers,” she added. The biggest shift in demand has been users looking at more niche luxury smartwatches or switching to more specific terms when searching on Google.
Our research, which also looked at search interest for traditional time pieces, found that demand for mechanical watches remained a top priority for luxury consumers in the same period.
Other insights from the research found that the United States led the way in terms of interest for luxury smartwatches in 2018, accounting for 46.4 percent of searches for the term “luxury smartwatch” in English globally. This was followed by Other Countries, which accounted for 31.9 percent, the United Kingdom at 9.6 percent, Canada at 4.6 percent, Australia at 4 percent and India 3.5 percent.
Consumers searching for “luxury smartwatch” in 2018 were also predominantly using their mobile devices to conduct Google searches, which accounted for 66 percent of interest, this is followed by desktop computers at 27.7 percent and tablet computers at 6.8 percent.
Looking forward, our Head of Search believes that brand uplifts or new players entering the market who demonstrate innovative models could help drive further interest in smartwatches.
“Just like any new commodity that’s been on the market for a few years, the demand plateaus at some point and then users tend to opt for more specific and niche searches,” she said. “At a models or brands level though, we might see uplifts or even new players come through depending on the innovation or marketing pushes, she added.